1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |