1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2003 MG TF

To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 5 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.

Compare all specifications: