1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2003 Toyota Condor

To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 305 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (196 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.

Compare all specifications: