1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (168 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | 600 | S40 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |