1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1257 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | 600 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 2422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |
