1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2004 Ford Econovan

To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 131 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600.

Because 2004 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econovan.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Dodge 600 2004 Ford Econovan
Make Dodge Ford
Model 600 Econovan
Year Released 1982 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2212 cc 1789 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 96 HP 90 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 158 Nm 138 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1165 kg 1296 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1870 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2210 mm