1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (98 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | 600 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2590 mm |
