1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2005 Fiat Idea

To start off, 2005 Fiat Idea is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Idea. (71 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Idea.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Fiat Idea (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Fiat Idea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Dodge 600 2005 Fiat Idea
Make Dodge Fiat
Model 600 Idea
Year Released 1982 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2212 cc 1368 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 96 HP 71 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 158 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]