1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2005 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 307 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.

Compare all specifications: