1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (213 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 600 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
