1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-290 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Isuzu I-290. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-290 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Dodge | Isuzu |
Model | 600 | I-290 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3210 mm |