1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2008 MG ZT
To start off, 2008 MG ZT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZT (134 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT weights approximately 460 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2008 MG ZT | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | 600 | ZT |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |