1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Renault Clio (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 25 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | 600 | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |