1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (200 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 56 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (85 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | 600 | Polo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1221 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2470 mm |