1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 224 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2009 Ford Flex | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | 600 | Flex |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3000 mm |