1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 26 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1597 cc |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
