1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | 600 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2490 mm |