1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2010 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2010 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
| Model | 600 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
