1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |