1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2011 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2011 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | 600 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
