1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | 600 | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2908 mm |