1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 567 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (409 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.

Compare all specifications: