1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 798 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1963 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2875 mm |
