1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 300 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Omni | XK |
Year Released | 1982 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 63 L |