1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1955 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge Omni weights approximately 130 kg more than 1955 Triumph TR2.
Because 1955 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1955 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Omni | TR2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1955 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 56 L |