1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1965 Maserati Quattroporte
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Quattroporte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Quattroporte would be higher. At 4,136 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Maserati Quattroporte weights approximately 705 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1965 Maserati Quattroporte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati Quattroporte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1965 Maserati Quattroporte | |
Make | Dodge | Maserati |
Model | Omni | Quattroporte |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 4136 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2760 mm |