1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge Omni weights approximately 65 kg more than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Omni | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 39 L |