1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 35 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Omni | Sigma |
Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2520 mm |