1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1991 Jaguar XJR-15
To start off, 1991 Jaguar XJR-15 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Jaguar XJR-15 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Jaguar XJR-15 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1991 Jaguar XJR-15 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Jaguar XJR-15. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1991 Jaguar XJR-15 | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Omni | XJR-15 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1991 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 5993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 450 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 307 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 90 L |