1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Taurus weights approximately 597 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Omni | Taurus |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 61 L |