1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 486 more horse power than 1982 Dodge Omni. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 522 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Omni | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 550 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2720 mm |