1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 405 more horse power than 1982 Dodge Omni. (64 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge Omni. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 302 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (178 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm). This means 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge Omni | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Omni | XR 8 Xplod |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 469 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 132 L |
