1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge Omni weights approximately 20 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Omni | Smart |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 47 L |