1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 215 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Omni | Pajero |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 50 L |