1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2004 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2004 Dodge Ram is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1273 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2004 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2004 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Omni | Ram |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 8276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 493 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 98 L |