1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 757 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Omni | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3932 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 68 L |