1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2004 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2004 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge Omni weights approximately 250 kg more than 2004 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2004 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Dodge | ZAZ |
Model | Omni | Wagon |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2330 mm |