1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Omni | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 60 L |