1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2005 MG TF
To start off, 2005 MG TF is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MG TF weights approximately 175 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2005 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2005 MG TF | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Omni | TF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 50 L |