1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1982 Dodge Omni. (64 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge Omni. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Omni | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 87 L |