1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1982 Dodge Omni. (64 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge Omni | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Omni | Raider |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 83 L |
