1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1048 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge Omni | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Omni | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 85 L |
