1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2009 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Swift is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 300 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2009 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2009 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Omni | Swift |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 43 L |