1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2010 Opel Antara
To start off, 2010 Opel Antara is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Opel Antara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Opel Antara weights approximately 850 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2010 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge Omni | 2010 Opel Antara | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Omni | Antara |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 203 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 65 L |
