1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 597 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge Omni | 2010 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
| Model | Omni | Eos |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 206 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4423 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1444 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2578 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |
