1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 969 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge Omni | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Omni | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1964 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 76 L |
