1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1589 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge Omni | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
| Model | Omni | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2584 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2891 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 104 L |
