1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 709 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2013 Ferrari California | |
Make | Dodge | Ferrari |
Model | Omni | California |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 504 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 78 L |