1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2013 Ford Fusion is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Fusion weights approximately 565 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Ford Fusion is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fusion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2013 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Omni | Fusion |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 234 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4869 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 66 L |