1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE weights approximately 885 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Omni | F-TYPE |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2909 mm |